I like to read John Good's blog, <http://leftinaboite.blogspot.com/>. He does a great job with his blog and he does a fairly good job of illustrating The Democratic point of view. That being said he posted a piece entitled "Hunger has been eliminated" that is one of the least accurate pieces I have read in a long time.
Please go and read the article entitled "Hunger has been eliminated" at <http://leftinaboite.blogspot.com/> and then come back here and we can discuss it.
I have copied the post here for ease:
Hunger has been eliminated!
Paging George Carlin. . .Mr.Carlin, your country needs you. . .
Claiming that the term "hungry" is "not a scientifically accurate term for the specific phenomenon being measured in their food security survey, and stating that "we don't have a measure of that condition", the US government has decided to drop the word "hunger" from its vocabulary. The condition formerly known as hunger shall henceforth be referred to as "very low food security". Statistically speaking, hunger will no longer exist in America.
The government report follows five straight years of increases in the number of Americans unable to afford the food they need. While the USDA may feel comfortable saying there is no hunger in America, simply because they can't find a precise scientific measure to describe it. It is not so difficult. In fact, it's so easy a child could do it. A young boy at a San Francisco food pantry knows exactly how to describe hunger. He says, "My stomach is touching my back.
"If the government stops using the word "hunger," people may begin to believe that hunger has gone away. It hasn't. Just ask that little boy whose stomach is touching his back. However, by any name, the statistics are grim: 35 million people in America are living in "food-insecure" households. Seniors and children are especially at risk. Hunger is especially devastating for our most vulnerable citizens: children and seniors.
Yet for the past six years, the Bush administration has been cutting food-assistance programs, and in some cases, proposing to eliminate them. The continued unraveling of our nation's food safety net, will mean that more elderly Americans will go to bed hungry, more working poor parents will have to choose between paying the rent or putting food on the table, and more children will perform poorly in school and be unprepared for productive work lives.
The new Democratic-led Congress has an important opportunity to reverse these policies. They can take the lead in combating hunger by restoring and increasing funding for the government food-assistance programs that provide vital nutrition to low-income Americans. And they should never be afraid to call hunger by its name.
My comment I left on his blog is below:
I am NOT sure where to start with this post...
The fact that the Feds want to stop using the word "hunger" helps to show how silly these large Government programs really are...
The rest of this post is quite possibly one of the least accurate posts I HAVE EVER SEEN on this blog.
John, I respectfully suggest you do some research on this topic! This is a Democratic talking point and it is an OUTRIGHT LIE.
The line item on the actual Federal Budget is "Food and Nutritional Assistance." Spending on this item has SKYROCKETED since 1962. All of my figures are taken directly from the US Budget and are rounded to the nearest million or billion dollars for simplicity.
1962. 275 Million dollar spent.
1970. 960 Million dollars spent.
1980. 13 Billion dollar spent.
1990. 21 Billion dollars spent.
2000. 28 Billion dollars spent.
2001. 29 Billion dollars spent.
2002. 33 Billion dollars spent.
2003. 37 Billion dollars spent.
2004. 41 Billion dollars spent.
2005. 48 Billion dollars spent.
2006. 51 Billion dollars spent.
The largest annual increase in the programs long history occurred from 2004 to 2005; when Republicans were in control... The program grew by 17% that year...
The 2001 - 2006 Budgets are directly attributable to a Republican President, a Republican House, and a Republican Senate...
From 2001 - 2006 "Federal Food and Nutritional Assistance" grew by 76%!
How is this causing people to starve? We are spending more then ever before and The Republicans are growing the program faster then Bill Clinton did...
Please take a few minutes and go look at the actual budget of The United States. It is easy to check my numbers...
Look at it this way:
About 13% of Americans live below The Federal poverty line. If HALF of them are on food assistance then this would be 19.5 million people. This would mean that last year The Federal government spent $2615 PER PERSON in 2006 to help feed them.
Note this does NOT count any Federal programs that give these same people income that can be spent on food nor does it include State programs nor does it include private charities nor does it include the Earned Income Tax Credit...
There are MANY different Federal food assistance programs. Each program has their own mission, administrators, staff, and agenda. It is one of the most inefficient setups you could imagine.
President Bush is proposing that we ELIMINATE the ones that do the least good and take the money that they would have received and give it to the food assistance programs that perform better. This would eliminate some of the waste, fraud, abuse, and unneeded overhead...
It is a GOOD idea.
I have ranted long enough...
I hope that everyone who read this learned something...
John Good, sorry for the rant. I imagine you just copied this from some left leaning sight without looking into it yourself!
I hate it when I see "talking points" that are this inaccurate.
Mike Sylvester
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contributors
Search This Blog
Pages
Offices on the Ballot - Allen County 2024
OFFICES ON THE 2024 BALLOT ALLEN COUNTY INDIANA FEDERAL President of the United States United States Representative Dist...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(416)
-
▼
November
(47)
- Democrats are considering breaking campaign promis...
- Karen Goldner, Fort Wayne City Council
- Clarification of military opt-out
- Scary Allen County statistic
- CPA Exam, FAR
- Democratic "talking point" is a lie
- With Republicans like Mitch Daniels who needs Demo...
- LPAC Meeting
- Colts go down in game 10
- Poll about the next two years
- Steve Shine in the spotlight, again...
- A great Fort Wayne service provided by the St Joe ...
- Democrats dodge a bullet today
- Belmont California takes away private property rights
- 25 of 49 Senate Republicans are some of the dumbes...
- Libertarians on Fort Wayne Public Access Thursday ...
- Jeff Pruitt and his thought on my 22 Campaign pred...
- United States Health Care system is failing a litt...
- Representative John Murtha would be a disaster for...
- Healthcare crisis looms
- Kevin Knuth, Allen County Democratic Chair, weighs...
- More on Freedom of Speech and "discussing" Child M...
- Chinese submarine stalks US warships
- AWB and the "nannies" trying to shut down his blog
- Freedom of Speech in Fort Wayne
- Freedom of Speech violated in Fort Wayne; again
- We went to see the Colts play today
- Economics lesson about healthcare
- Stan Matuska weighs in on my Post 2006 Election Pr...
- Predictions update
- Post 2006 Election Predictions
- Rush Limbaugh admits he was tired of shilling for ...
- President Bush surrenders to Democrats and Rumsfel...
- Indiana Election Results, what they mean
- Indiana Election Results
- Allen County and Fort Wayne Election Results
- Voting Machine problems in Indiana
- Indiana voting problems this morning!
- Voting
- Libertarians will vote for more Democrats today th...
- Election phone calls
- Election 2006 Predictions
- Republicans and Democrats, is there really a diffe...
- Fort Wayne airport needs low service provider
- Jeff Pruitt says it best on this one...
- Please stop trying to make Fort Wayne like Indiana...
- Mark Souder lies again
-
▼
November
(47)
-
Several people have asked me what I think will happen in the next few months. I am going to give you my opinion on how I think things will g...
-
I went to the Northwest Area Partnership Meeting tonight. This is a group that consists of many neighborhood association officers/ Quite a ...
-
In the comment section of an earlier post Sam Talarico commented that he was surprised that the News-Sentinel published my analysis of the r...
Labels
- 2008
- 2014 Elections
- 2016 Election
- 3rd District Congress
- 6th District Congress
- Abuse of Powers
- Administration
- Administration of the Blog
- After Dark Night Club
- AKA William
- Allen County Election Board
- Allen County Libertarian Party Bylaws 2020
- Andrew Horning
- Angry White Boy
- Annual Convention
- Annual Yard Sale
- April Fool's
- bailout
- ballot
- Barack Hussein Obama
- Barack Hussien Obama
- Benjamin Franklin
- Bill of Rights Day
- Bob Barr
- Borders
- Born Again American
- Candidates
- Chris Spangle
- Citilink
- City County Building
- Civic
- Commissioners
- Community
- Congress
- Congressional Pay
- Consultants
- corporate welfare
- County Government
- Courts
- Crime
- Dan Drexler
- David Roach
- death
- Debates
- Democrats
- Donald Trump
- Doug Horner
- Drinking
- Early Voting
- Economics
- economy
- education
- Elections
- Entreprenural Initiatives
- Enviroment
- Equality
- ethanol
- Events
- Excercise
- F6
- farm Animals
- Federal
- Federal Government
- Feedback
- Flag
- Flood
- Food and Beverage Taxes
- Foreign policy
- Forms
- Fort Wayne
- Fort Wayne City Council
- fort wayne mayor
- Fort Wayne Police Department
- Fox News
- fraud
- Fuel Efficeincy
- Fundraiser
- Gary Johnson
- Geoff Paddock
- George Mason
- GLBT
- Glenn Beck
- GOP
- government
- Government Waste
- Grassroots Inititives
- Green Links
- Haiti
- Harrison Square
- Health Care Reform
- Heartland Communities
- Honey
- HRC FW
- Humor
- immigration
- Income
- Income Taxes
- Indiana
- Indiana House District 83
- IPFW
- Jack Evans
- James Madison
- Jdimytai Damour
- John Schick
- John Sidney McCain
- Joseph Biden
- Journal Gazette
- K P Nfr
- Kevin Leininger
- Kody Tinnel
- LaPorte County LP
- legacy fund
- libertarian
- Libertarian Party
- Libertarian Party of Indiana
- Libertarians AT Large
- Links
- Local
- LPIN
- LPIN Officers
- Mark Skousen
- Memorial Coliseum
- Military
- Minimum Wage
- Modest Proposal
- MrTacoJosh
- Music
- My HUD House
- Nanny State
- National Debt
- New Blog
- New Design
- News Sentinel
- Next Business Meeting
- occupy movement
- Oprah
- OUTright Libertarians
- OWS
- passenger rail
- Penn Jillette
- Phil Marx
- Pictures
- Planning
- Political Parties
- Politics
- Pot Holes
- Powers Hamburgers
- predictions
- Presidential Nominations
- Press
- QR Codes
- Queer Cincinnati
- Questions
- Radio
- Random Facts
- Real ID
- Robert Fuller
- RSVP
- Sandbags
- Sarah Palin
- Save Maumee
- Scott Wise
- Secretary of State
- Senate
- Sicko by Michael Moore
- Social
- space
- spending
- State Convention
- State Of Indiana
- State of Michigan
- Stephen Moore
- stimulus
- Street Dept.
- Student Body President
- Supreme Court
- Tax Protest
- taxes
- terrorism
- The Paradox of Affluence In Politics
- The Second Coming
- Thomas Jefferson
- Three Rivers
- TinCaps
- tom henry
- Top Libertarian Blogs
- tragedy
- transportation
- Updates
- US HISTORY
- Veterans Day
- video
- Voter Centers
- Voter Registration
- Wal*Mart
- welfare
- Wesley In Austin
- Why Libertarian
- William Butler Yeats
- William Larsen
Sitemeter
Followers
About Commenting
Keep it clean and relevant to the post. If you have a question that isn't related to a recent post, email me at enders.robert@gmail.com . You can also email me if you want to make an anonymous comment.
DISCLAIMER
Per the by-laws of the Libertarian Party of Allen County, the Chair is the official spokesperson of LPAC in all public and media matters.
Posts and contributions expressed on this forum, while being libertarian in thought and intent, no official statement of LPAC should be derived or assumed unless specifically stated as such from the Chair, or another Officer of the Party acting in his or her place, and such statements are always subject to review.
Posts and contributions expressed on this forum, while being libertarian in thought and intent, no official statement of LPAC should be derived or assumed unless specifically stated as such from the Chair, or another Officer of the Party acting in his or her place, and such statements are always subject to review.
11 comments:
I've pointed out to John & Robert Rouse (among others) many times how innacurate a lot of the talking points and claims are coming from the left. A story gets "floated" and cited then linked over and over so it grows exponentially and becomes accepted as true.
This is one of the worst ones Tim...
You ought to go over to John's blog and read the comments...
Talk about people who would believe ANYTHING...
Mike Sylvester
The most effective type of charity is private charity- as illustrated by the hurricane and tsu-nami relief efforts. Does anyone believe that the hungry would benefit if the taxes to cover this inefficient aid were *gone* and individuals got to keep more of their income? Would THAT generate MORE privately funded relief to the hungry?
A more important question is - Where does the government get the AUTHORITY to take taxpayer money to give to the hungry?
Is that authority in the Constitution?
One Radical Libbe-tarian
In case you hadn't noticed Mike, logic goes right out the window when they circle the wagons. You go from pointing out some factual inaccuracies to being a heartless prick pretty quickly eh?
Well said Tim...
Robert Rouse even went to Iraq to point out that of course we can afford to spend more on the poor...
Mike Sylvester
Hey Anonymous . . . the Preamble of the Constitution gives them the authority to "promte the general welfare". I guess all you have to do is at least read the first paragraph.
BTW, Mike, I didn't use Iraq (nor have I ever gone to Iraq) to point out we can spend more on hunger, I brought up Iraq as a good example of wasting taxpayers money. Or do you think that the fiasco in Iraq is a good place to spend our money?
And Tim . . . Tim, Tim, Tim . . . you're a fine one to talk about using political party talking points. You use Republican talking points all the time. Or is it that that GOP talking points are always valid and Democratic talking points are never valid?
Obviously Robert, mine are more valid than yours!!!! hahahahahaha
I'm killin' me!!
Tim - Please continue "killing you". . .lol
John: noted
Post a Comment