Monday, June 18, 2007

This blog is popular among city employees!

AWB says that a computer in the city-county building was used to check this blog 11 times today. I presume that Internet usage is an established perk of city employees. I hope that it was 11 different people and not some obsessed nut checking for new posts every hour. There's no way I can update that often.


Angry White Boy said...

It was the same computer. From your stats, here's the profile of their computer:

Operating System Microsoft WinXP
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
Color Depth : 16 bits

Today they've been on yours only twice, I suppose they read this because they hopped over to mine from here but have not been back.

Guess I spooked them ;)

Robert Enders said...

I was hoping that I had a whole gaggle of fans.

All government employees should be advised that their internet usage is being monitored by the admins. I suggest that you walk a few blocks to the main branch of the ACPL when you want to check out the LPAC blog.
Do you know how long I've been waiting to use "ACPL" and "LPAC" in the same sentence?

Search This Blog

Alfie Evans

1. When a doctor says A and a parent says B, I tend to go with what the doctor says. Usually the doctors are right. After reviewing Alfie...

Blog Archive


Brgd. General Anthony Wayne US Continental Army


My blog is worth $11,855.34.
How much is your blog worth?


About Commenting

Keep it clean and relevant to the post. If you have a question that isn't related to a recent post, email me at . You can also email me if you want to make an anonymous comment.


Per the by-laws of the Libertarian Party of Allen County, the Chair is the official spokesperson of LPAC in all public and media matters.

Posts and contributions expressed on this forum, while being libertarian in thought and intent, no official statement of LPAC should be derived or assumed unless specifically stated as such from the Chair, or another Officer of the Party acting in his or her place, and such statements are always subject to review.