If smoking is to be considered a privilege and not a right, then veterans have earned that privilege. Many veterans had to work in an environment that contained substances far more hazardous than secondhand smoke. The most notorious of these is secondhand lead. Secondhand lead has been known for centuries to cause brain damage, organ failure, paralysis, and death.
Quite a few of these men were not given a choice of whether they wanted to work in that environment. You can quit a civilian job anytime you want. But it's a lot harder to get out of the military than it is to get in. So at least let veteran's clubs smoke.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contributors
Search This Blog
Pages
Offices on the Ballot - Allen County 2024
OFFICES ON THE 2024 BALLOT ALLEN COUNTY INDIANA FEDERAL President of the United States United States Representative Dist...
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(547)
-
▼
December
(31)
- More needless government interference
- Accident Followup - and a question for all of you
- The city must disclose what's in the environmental...
- ONE v/s FWO - My Opinion FWO!!!
- Our policians and the NFL
- Doug was in an accident
- Fort Wayne Combined Sewer Overflow
- Before you use your computer again, read this
- Friday NIght and the IPFW Libertarians
- Election Board meeting today
- Thursday night
- Health Care part 1: Fast track FDA approval
- Public Access Live
- Incandescent light bulbs to be phased out.
- At least let veterans smoke in their clubs.
- New Sentinel has an interesting piece tonight
- Democrats, President Bush, and the failures of Con...
- NIPSCO
- Office Update
- A little experiment
- New Media New Rules Public Forum Dec. 20
- LPAC 2.0 turns 3
- National Party Resolution on Ron Paul
- Some good news
- New Building, the good and the bad
- Open Thread Post: Presidetial Primary Edition!!!
- My new blog is up
- Would this work here?
- New Office, the good...
- Hillary Clinton calls NAFTA a mistake.
- My take on the New Hampshire hostage taker
-
▼
December
(31)
-
Several people have asked me what I think will happen in the next few months. I am going to give you my opinion on how I think things will g...
-
I went to the Northwest Area Partnership Meeting tonight. This is a group that consists of many neighborhood association officers/ Quite a ...
-
In the comment section of an earlier post Sam Talarico commented that he was surprised that the News-Sentinel published my analysis of the r...
Labels
- 2008
- 2014 Elections
- 2016 Election
- 3rd District Congress
- 6th District Congress
- Abuse of Powers
- Administration
- Administration of the Blog
- After Dark Night Club
- AKA William
- Allen County Election Board
- Allen County Libertarian Party Bylaws 2020
- Andrew Horning
- Angry White Boy
- Annual Convention
- Annual Yard Sale
- April Fool's
- bailout
- ballot
- Barack Hussein Obama
- Barack Hussien Obama
- Benjamin Franklin
- Bill of Rights Day
- Bob Barr
- Borders
- Born Again American
- Candidates
- Chris Spangle
- Citilink
- City County Building
- Civic
- Commissioners
- Community
- Congress
- Congressional Pay
- Consultants
- corporate welfare
- County Government
- Courts
- Crime
- Dan Drexler
- David Roach
- death
- Debates
- Democrats
- Donald Trump
- Doug Horner
- Drinking
- Early Voting
- Economics
- economy
- education
- Elections
- Entreprenural Initiatives
- Enviroment
- Equality
- ethanol
- Events
- Excercise
- F6
- farm Animals
- Federal
- Federal Government
- Feedback
- Flag
- Flood
- Food and Beverage Taxes
- Foreign policy
- Forms
- Fort Wayne
- Fort Wayne City Council
- fort wayne mayor
- Fort Wayne Police Department
- Fox News
- fraud
- Fuel Efficeincy
- Fundraiser
- Gary Johnson
- Geoff Paddock
- George Mason
- GLBT
- Glenn Beck
- GOP
- government
- Government Waste
- Grassroots Inititives
- Green Links
- Haiti
- Harrison Square
- Health Care Reform
- Heartland Communities
- Honey
- HRC FW
- Humor
- immigration
- Income
- Income Taxes
- Indiana
- Indiana House District 83
- IPFW
- Jack Evans
- James Madison
- Jdimytai Damour
- John Schick
- John Sidney McCain
- Joseph Biden
- Journal Gazette
- K P Nfr
- Kevin Leininger
- Kody Tinnel
- LaPorte County LP
- legacy fund
- libertarian
- Libertarian Party
- Libertarian Party of Indiana
- Libertarians AT Large
- Links
- Local
- LPIN
- LPIN Officers
- Mark Skousen
- Memorial Coliseum
- Military
- Minimum Wage
- Modest Proposal
- MrTacoJosh
- Music
- My HUD House
- Nanny State
- National Debt
- New Blog
- New Design
- News Sentinel
- Next Business Meeting
- occupy movement
- Oprah
- OUTright Libertarians
- OWS
- passenger rail
- Penn Jillette
- Phil Marx
- Pictures
- Planning
- Political Parties
- Politics
- Pot Holes
- Powers Hamburgers
- predictions
- Presidential Nominations
- Press
- QR Codes
- Queer Cincinnati
- Questions
- Radio
- Random Facts
- Real ID
- Robert Fuller
- RSVP
- Sandbags
- Sarah Palin
- Save Maumee
- Scott Wise
- Secretary of State
- Senate
- Sicko by Michael Moore
- Social
- space
- spending
- State Convention
- State Of Indiana
- State of Michigan
- Stephen Moore
- stimulus
- Street Dept.
- Student Body President
- Supreme Court
- Tax Protest
- taxes
- terrorism
- The Paradox of Affluence In Politics
- The Second Coming
- Thomas Jefferson
- Three Rivers
- TinCaps
- tom henry
- Top Libertarian Blogs
- tragedy
- transportation
- Updates
- US HISTORY
- Veterans Day
- video
- Voter Centers
- Voter Registration
- Wal*Mart
- welfare
- Wesley In Austin
- Why Libertarian
- William Butler Yeats
- William Larsen
Sitemeter
Followers
About Commenting
Keep it clean and relevant to the post. If you have a question that isn't related to a recent post, email me at enders.robert@gmail.com . You can also email me if you want to make an anonymous comment.
DISCLAIMER
Per the by-laws of the Libertarian Party of Allen County, the Chair is the official spokesperson of LPAC in all public and media matters.
Posts and contributions expressed on this forum, while being libertarian in thought and intent, no official statement of LPAC should be derived or assumed unless specifically stated as such from the Chair, or another Officer of the Party acting in his or her place, and such statements are always subject to review.
Posts and contributions expressed on this forum, while being libertarian in thought and intent, no official statement of LPAC should be derived or assumed unless specifically stated as such from the Chair, or another Officer of the Party acting in his or her place, and such statements are always subject to review.
6 comments:
No matter what the sacrifice these veterans made, there are those among us that know what's really best for us.
I am SOOOOOOOOOO grateful the state has decided to take care of me from womb to tomb.
I propose a name change:
THE U-NANNY STATES OF AMERICA.
Gotta ring to it, eh??
So you want to create an even more un-even playing field? How long before those organizations simply let in the general public? What do you think other restaurants and bars would say about that?
It either needs to cover everybody or nobody
Jeff, I don't think the rule should cover anybody. When I don't like a rule, I try
to argue for as many exceptions as possible. Even if I can't protect everybody from the bad rule, I can still protect a few by trying to get the government to make exceptions.
It's like when people opposed the draft during Vietnam. They tried to claim medical deferment or CO status. They go to college, or get jobs in an essential industry. They pretend to be gay or crazy. And some just plain refused to go. If you can't fight the system head-on, you work around it or even within it.
If you want to make the draft "fair", you apply it to everyone regardless of gender, occupation or income level. You take 60-year-old grandmothers and send them into combat. If you want to make the smoking ban "fair", you apply it to private residences.
In fact, if the public health is your concern, you ban alchohol as well. Anyone who is concerned about their health avoids both smoking and drinking, or at least indulges in moderation.
Good point Robert. Obviously, the smoking ban proponents are not worried about fairness. If you want to ban smoking, you do it on a statewide level (anybody remember the 10th Amendment). If you want it to be most effective, you would ban it in places where people are stuck without a choice, such as cars and private residences. If you want to be arbitrary and capricious, you ban it in bars but exempt tobacco outlets. The more we can whittle away at that ridiculous ordinance, the better.
Tim,
I agree completely.
Robert,
I also agree and understand your reasoning for trying to find exceptions and compromises. I think City Council should look for ways to reasonably reduce the ban to please both sides.
We don't live in a country of absolutes, so compromise is a necessary thing, but compromise requires common sense as well as common ground.
I'm a smoker, I don't smoke around my kids or in my home, or around others whom it bothers. I do smoke around other smokers and in bars and I don't think my second hand smoke affects anyone adversely.
If I rolled up the windows in my car with kids in it and smoked, yes, I think that would be dangerous because of the concentration.
However, it is preposterous (not to mention unprovable) to assume the second hand inhaled from a night at Pierre's is any more detrimental than standing on a street corner when a city bus goes by.
Could anybody give me a heads up on when these second hand smoke deaths are going to start?
Post a Comment