Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Allen COunty smoking ordinance is HORRIBLY written

Allen County Smoking Ordinance is poorly written

The proposed Allen County smoking ordinance is poorly written and needs to be clarified before it is voted on.

The ordinance exempts “Private residences, except when used as a licensed child care, adult care, or Health Care Facility.”

What does this mean? I spoke to several Allen County officials about the definition of a “Private residence.” None of the officials I spoke to could define a “private residence.” Allen County Code does not define a “private residence.” The proposed smoking ordinance does not define a “private residence.”

Will the proposed smoking ban affect a home owner who has a home office and runs a small business out of their home? Will the proposed smoking ban affect a home owner who has had their residence rezoned into a commercial property? Will it affect a home owner who has a “use variance” in place so they can conduct commercial business on their property? I once again talked to several individuals that work for Allen County and not one of them could answer any of these questions either. This must be clarified in the proposed ordinance.

The posting requirements are the worst section of this document. Per section 10-8-4 “any establishment exempted shall post the following sign at the main entrance: “Warning: This is a smoking establishment.”

My wife and I are accountants and each have an office in our home. If our house qualifies as a “private residence” we would be exempt from the proposed smoking ordinance. My wife and I choose NOT to allow people to smoke in our house.

Per section 10-8-4 we will be required to post a sign on our front door, even though we do not allow smoking in our house, that says “Warning: This is a smoking establishment.”

Section 10-8-4 needs to be re-written. I do not allow smoking in my home; it is absurd that this ordinance will require me to post a sign at the main entrance of my house stating that it is a smoking establishment. As written this ordinance would require every person who has a business in their home to post a sign at their front entrance stating that it is smoking establishment, whether you allow smoking or not.

This ordinance will affect hundreds of thousands of people if it is enacted. I hope the County Commissioners take the time to write it properly and then let the public comment on it after the errors are fixed.

Mike Sylvester
Chairman of the Libertarian Party of Allen County

9 comments:

Robert Enders said...

Is your house an "establishment"? I believe the ordinance does not apply to private residences unless they are a day care center or health care facility.

If your house is an "establishment", you have to either post "No Smoking" signs or a sign that says that your house is a smoking establishment.

I should also point out that there is the law as it is written and the law as it is obeyed and enforced. I doubt that you would face any charges unless someone in the county really had a bone to pick with you.

LP Mike Sylvester said...

What are you talking about Robert?

It all has to do with the definition of a "Private Residence." What is a "Private Residence?" It is not defined in Allen County Code.

And if you are EXEMPT you must post a sign saying that you ALLOW smoking...

I highly suggest you read the entire ordinance and post again...

Also, you final comment may be true; but, it is not the point... I am against putting laws on the books that are not enforced...

Do you for some reason think it is a good idea to pass laws that no one follows?

Mike Sylvester

Andrew Kaduk said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Andrew Kaduk said...

I have seen many instances of frivelous laws being passed that then go completely unenforced. These laws are meant to appease certain annoying interest groups at politically expedient times.

Annoying.

Mike Kole said...

The problem with laws on the books but generally unenforced is that a) such laws breed contempt for the law; and b) such laws can suddenly become enforced against you if it becomes politically expedient from the perspective of the enforcer.

Arbitrary enforcement of law is a dangerous situation. People who speak in opposition to the powers that be are far more likely to find enforcement against them then people who play ball politically and yet break the seldom enforced rule.

Robert Enders said...

Often politicians will pass laws that they do not intend to be enforced in every case. Even they acknowlege that consistent enforcement of these laws will lead to disaster. I am not defending the practice, I'm simply pointing out that it happens.

For example, if our drug laws were consistently enforced, then 51% of all adults would have a criminal record. So some people are given pre-trial deferment. If they attend a few classes, they go free with a clean record as if it never happened. Basically, if you can afford your own lawyer, then you are just making a youthful indescretion. If you are using a public defender, then society needs to be protected from the likes of you. It is class-based discrimination.

Emmett Greider said...

Mike,

Good follow up on this issue. Not sure it will make much difference, but your vigilence is commendable.

In the commissioners defense, they do say that this is a draft. Maybe it's their policy to put out the best draft possible, let people comment on it, and then revise it accordingly. Let's hope it is, because you're right, if it is adopted as written, AC will spend a lot of money on lawyers fees dealing with inevitable lawsuits.

Andrew Kaduk said...

Mr. Kole,

I do believe the Cherry Master debacle is a prime example of your claim. For years, law enforcement decidedly had better things to worry about than a bunch of bar flies shoveling tens and twenties into those moronic machines. Add some keen political interest (for whatever reason) at a seemingly arbitrary time, and voila, you now have tavern owners and gaming lessors statewide scrambling to generate auxilliary revenue streams. I'm not sure I've ever heard (other than speculating pundits' equally arbitrary opinions) exactly what the nature of the timing or interest was with respect to those stupid video games, but somebody obviously got an itch...

Anonymous said...

Mike is correct to request clarification on the text of the law. Poorly written laws usually end up in court where they only serve to waste more taxpayer money.

And it is NEVER justified to make laws that you don't plan to enforce. This undermines the entire criminal justice system and can lead to abuse and corruption.

Search This Blog

Offices on the Ballot - Allen County 2024

  OFFICES ON THE 2024 BALLOT ALLEN COUNTY INDIANA   FEDERAL   President of the United States United States Representative Dist...

Blog Archive

Labels


Brgd. General Anthony Wayne US Continental Army

Sitemeter




My blog is worth $11,855.34.
How much is your blog worth?

Followers

About Commenting

Keep it clean and relevant to the post. If you have a question that isn't related to a recent post, email me at enders.robert@gmail.com . You can also email me if you want to make an anonymous comment.

DISCLAIMER

Per the by-laws of the Libertarian Party of Allen County, the Chair is the official spokesperson of LPAC in all public and media matters.

Posts and contributions expressed on this forum, while being libertarian in thought and intent, no official statement of LPAC should be derived or assumed unless specifically stated as such from the Chair, or another Officer of the Party acting in his or her place, and such statements are always subject to review.