Thursday, August 12, 2010
Push polling taking place
I just got a call from a poll taker. He asked if I was voting for Mike Obergfell or Win Moses. I told him I was voting for Elizabeth Sepponen. If a poll does not include all of the available options, it is not a legitimate poll. I have noticed that some poll takers are better than others about including all the candidate in a particular race.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Contributors
Search This Blog
Pages
Offices on the Ballot - Allen County 2024
OFFICES ON THE 2024 BALLOT ALLEN COUNTY INDIANA FEDERAL President of the United States United States Representative Dist...
Blog Archive
-
Several people have asked me what I think will happen in the next few months. I am going to give you my opinion on how I think things will g...
-
I went to the Northwest Area Partnership Meeting tonight. This is a group that consists of many neighborhood association officers/ Quite a ...
-
In the comment section of an earlier post Sam Talarico commented that he was surprised that the News-Sentinel published my analysis of the r...
Labels
- 2008
- 2014 Elections
- 2016 Election
- 3rd District Congress
- 6th District Congress
- Abuse of Powers
- Administration
- Administration of the Blog
- After Dark Night Club
- AKA William
- Allen County Election Board
- Allen County Libertarian Party Bylaws 2020
- Andrew Horning
- Angry White Boy
- Annual Convention
- Annual Yard Sale
- April Fool's
- bailout
- ballot
- Barack Hussein Obama
- Barack Hussien Obama
- Benjamin Franklin
- Bill of Rights Day
- Bob Barr
- Borders
- Born Again American
- Candidates
- Chris Spangle
- Citilink
- City County Building
- Civic
- Commissioners
- Community
- Congress
- Congressional Pay
- Consultants
- corporate welfare
- County Government
- Courts
- Crime
- Dan Drexler
- David Roach
- death
- Debates
- Democrats
- Donald Trump
- Doug Horner
- Drinking
- Early Voting
- Economics
- economy
- education
- Elections
- Entreprenural Initiatives
- Enviroment
- Equality
- ethanol
- Events
- Excercise
- F6
- farm Animals
- Federal
- Federal Government
- Feedback
- Flag
- Flood
- Food and Beverage Taxes
- Foreign policy
- Forms
- Fort Wayne
- Fort Wayne City Council
- fort wayne mayor
- Fort Wayne Police Department
- Fox News
- fraud
- Fuel Efficeincy
- Fundraiser
- Gary Johnson
- Geoff Paddock
- George Mason
- GLBT
- Glenn Beck
- GOP
- government
- Government Waste
- Grassroots Inititives
- Green Links
- Haiti
- Harrison Square
- Health Care Reform
- Heartland Communities
- Honey
- HRC FW
- Humor
- immigration
- Income
- Income Taxes
- Indiana
- Indiana House District 83
- IPFW
- Jack Evans
- James Madison
- Jdimytai Damour
- John Schick
- John Sidney McCain
- Joseph Biden
- Journal Gazette
- K P Nfr
- Kevin Leininger
- Kody Tinnel
- LaPorte County LP
- legacy fund
- libertarian
- Libertarian Party
- Libertarian Party of Indiana
- Libertarians AT Large
- Links
- Local
- LPIN
- LPIN Officers
- Mark Skousen
- Memorial Coliseum
- Military
- Minimum Wage
- Modest Proposal
- MrTacoJosh
- Music
- My HUD House
- Nanny State
- National Debt
- New Blog
- New Design
- News Sentinel
- Next Business Meeting
- occupy movement
- Oprah
- OUTright Libertarians
- OWS
- passenger rail
- Penn Jillette
- Phil Marx
- Pictures
- Planning
- Political Parties
- Politics
- Pot Holes
- Powers Hamburgers
- predictions
- Presidential Nominations
- Press
- QR Codes
- Queer Cincinnati
- Questions
- Radio
- Random Facts
- Real ID
- Robert Fuller
- RSVP
- Sandbags
- Sarah Palin
- Save Maumee
- Scott Wise
- Secretary of State
- Senate
- Sicko by Michael Moore
- Social
- space
- spending
- State Convention
- State Of Indiana
- State of Michigan
- Stephen Moore
- stimulus
- Street Dept.
- Student Body President
- Supreme Court
- Tax Protest
- taxes
- terrorism
- The Paradox of Affluence In Politics
- The Second Coming
- Thomas Jefferson
- Three Rivers
- TinCaps
- tom henry
- Top Libertarian Blogs
- tragedy
- transportation
- Updates
- US HISTORY
- Veterans Day
- video
- Voter Centers
- Voter Registration
- Wal*Mart
- welfare
- Wesley In Austin
- Why Libertarian
- William Butler Yeats
- William Larsen
Sitemeter
Followers
About Commenting
Keep it clean and relevant to the post. If you have a question that isn't related to a recent post, email me at enders.robert@gmail.com . You can also email me if you want to make an anonymous comment.
DISCLAIMER
Per the by-laws of the Libertarian Party of Allen County, the Chair is the official spokesperson of LPAC in all public and media matters.
Posts and contributions expressed on this forum, while being libertarian in thought and intent, no official statement of LPAC should be derived or assumed unless specifically stated as such from the Chair, or another Officer of the Party acting in his or her place, and such statements are always subject to review.
Posts and contributions expressed on this forum, while being libertarian in thought and intent, no official statement of LPAC should be derived or assumed unless specifically stated as such from the Chair, or another Officer of the Party acting in his or her place, and such statements are always subject to review.
8 comments:
I wonder if they can be sued for publishing known to be false data?
No. I took a class about this sort of thing. There are no legal repercussions for publishing unreliable statistical data. I could say 87% of all Republicans sell cocaine and nobody could sue. But I would lose credibility for making such a statement without showing how I came up with that stat.
A person can be sued for libel if they publish a statement that causes damage to an entity's reputation.
>A person can be sued for libel if
>they publish a statement that causes
>damage to an entity's reputation.
A libertarian party comes to mind :)
Also you forgot "knowingly". There is still such a legal thing as "honest service" no matter how SCOTUS attacks it, but they could be self serving.
Libel law applies differently to politicians, activists, and other people who have voluntarily put themselves into a position where they would be covered by the media. When common person sues for libel, that person only has to show that a damaging statement was made. When politician sues for libel, he has to prove that there was malicious intent.
Intent is VERY hard to prove. This is why Obama has not sued anyone who says he was born in Kenya. On the other hand, if a blogger claimed that an obscure private citizen was really an illegal alien, that citizen could win a large judgement.
Any actual lawyers can feel free to step in and add to or correct what I just said.
Having received the same poll, I would disagree with your characterization of it as a "push poll." See the definition here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll - a push poll typically is one where you ask "If you knew that Candidate X were (insert libelous lie here), would you be more or less likely to vote for him/her?" The purpose is to spread rumor or innuendo about a candidate without having to directly take responsibility for such a statement. No such question was asked in this poll. Failure to include all the candidates may result in an incomplete or inaccurate poll, but it is not a push poll.
From the source you cited:
"A push poll is a political campaign technique in which an individual or organization attempts to influence or alter the view of respondents under the guise of conducting a poll."
The poll is clearly trying to push voters away from the dark horse candidate by eliminating her as an option. It would be like if in 2007 a poll was taken that asked "Who do you plan on voting for, Don Schmidt or Jon Bartels?"
I don't think you can properly asess this poll until the results are published. If the results are framed as "We asked potential voters who they would be voting for...", then the poll is worthless. On the other hand, if the results are framed as "We asked voters whether they would choose Moses or Obergfell..." then the poll is completely legitimate.
Most voters should be educated enough to realize that there are often third party or independent candidates who are not included in many polls. They should also be intelligent enough to realize that if there is not a category of "none of the above" or "other" included in the results, then the poll is pretty worthless.
Post a Comment